Search for: "Nelson Tebbe"
Results 141 - 157
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2014, 6:52 am
You can reach him by e-mail at schwartzman at virginia.eduNelson Tebbe is Professor of Law atBrooklyn Law School. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 9:34 am
Sabeel Rahman, Democracy Against Domination (2016); and Nelson Tebbe, Religious Freedom in an Egalitarian Age (2017). [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:13 am
In my contribution to the symposium, I disagree with an interpretation of his departures, developed primarily by Nelson Tebbe and Micah Schwartzman, that chalks them up to a "strategy of judicial appeasement. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:56 am
Last August, Micah Schwartzman and Nelson Tebbe argued on the Slate website that officials in Charlottesville had rights under the Constitution to ignore the Virginia state law protecting Confederate war memorials. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
At Balkinization, Nelson Tebbe contends that, although the “outcome was correct, the Court’s reasoning could spell trouble in the near future. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:57 am
In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Nelson Tebbe and others urge the court to “safeguard the principle of religious equality” by deeming the display unconstitutional. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
My Comments on How to Save A Constitutional Democracy by Huq and Ginsburg (Also posted at Take Care)
31 Oct 2018, 8:26 am
(Among others, I worked with Joshua Matz, the publisher on this blog, as well as Micah Schwartzman and Nelson Tebbe.) [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 5:33 pm
” Three law professors writing for the legal blog Just Security – Nelson Tebbe, Richard Schragger and Micah Schwartzman – make the opposite argument. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:10 pm
To quote the symposium contribution of my friends and colleagues Nelson Tebbe, Micah Schwartzman, and Richard Schragger, it is a “demand of justice” that political authorities in diverse and sometimes disagreeing communities avoid, to the extent their obligations to promote and protect the common good allow it, burdening religious exercise or violating religious conscience. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 10:03 pm
Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson Tebbe began an important conversation with their post on this blog about the contraceptive mandate and the Establishment Clause. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm
Kyle C. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson TebbeWe have been arguing (here, here, and here) that a religious exemption to the contraception mandate would raise serious concerns under the Establishment Clause. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Nelson Tebbe observes that this was different from earlier versions of MFN, because Kavanaugh "did not require the church to show that the exempted and regulated categories were comparable in order to shift the burden of justification to the government. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:09 am
Lawrence Sager & Nelson Tebbe This fall, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Fulton v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
In earlier posts, such as this one, I noted that in the context of commercial activities, the Supreme Court—and virtually every other court, for that matter—has consistently construed the Free Exercise Clause and religious accommodation statutes not to require religious exemptions from generally applicable regulations, from at least 1944 until this week. [read post]
