Search for: "Non Insurer Defendants"
Results 141 - 160
of 7,053
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2022, 11:12 am
It’s not uncommon for a Plaintiff side forensic accountant to have a different opinion or number than a Defendant side forensic accountant. [read post]
24 May 2021, 9:36 pm
After extensive briefing and oral argument, the Court of Appeal ruled that the Superior Court abused its discretion when it granted the defendant health insurance company’s motion to transfer the case to Germany and dismiss our clients’ bad faith health insurance lawsuit on the basis of forum non conveniens. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 3:30 am
The duty is non-delegable so that insurers cannot escape their duty of good faith and fair dealing by delegating tasks to third parties.1 The Colorado Designation of Non Parties at Fault statute specifies, at C.R.S. 13-21-111.5(6)(f)(I), that a Defendant cannot use a Designation of Nonparties when its duty is non-delegable. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 9:25 pm
Four years later, the plaintiffs discovered that the defendants had their own insurance policies in addition to the joint venture insurance policy. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 9:30 am
As a practical matter, the obligation to defend means that the insurer must hire and pay for a lawyer to defend any lawsuit on your behalf.Most policies allow the insurer to pick the lawyer. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 1:59 pm
The claim against the insured, a tenant, by the landlord, did not trigger the duty to defend. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 10:33 am
The plaintiff’s suit also named the driver with whom he was riding at the time of the crash, her motor vehicle accident insurance company, and the defendant motorist’s insurance carrier as defendants in the suit. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:39 am
In Ascension Insurance Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 11:34 am
After the judgment was affirmed on appeal, DC Mex filed a request for a writ of non-periodic garnishment naming the Prudential Insurance Company of America as the garnishee because Fuller owned an individual life insurance policy from Prudential with an approximate cash value of $73,078.91. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 11:52 am
It was undisputed that the plaintiff did not give the defendant insurance company advance notice. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 11:25 am
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. has no duty to defend Millennium’s subsidiary against data breach allegations. [read post]
25 May 2018, 3:47 pm
This defendant accused its insureds of fraudulently joining the insurance company’s law firm and one of the attorneys working for the law firm so that the case would have New Mexico plaintiffs and defendants, making it non-removable to federal court. [read post]
25 May 2018, 3:47 pm
This defendant accused its insureds of fraudulently joining the insurance company’s law firm and one of the attorneys working for the law firm so that the case would have New Mexico plaintiffs and defendants, making it non-removable to federal court. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 6:07 am
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals reviewed a wrongful death case involving a truck accident and addressed the issue of whether the defendant had insurance coverage. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 2:11 pm
The non-resident defendants argued that MPIC could not recover more than it could in a tort action, since the recovery was to be based on the principle of subrogation.The Appellate Court accepted the argument of the non-resident defendants and found that since the governing provision used the term “subrogated”, the Legislature must have intended that the Insurer could acquire the rights of the injured party, but no more. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm
Against plaintiff's advice, defendant, a non-practicing attorney, waived his right to a jury on the Nassau County indictment and proceeded to trial. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
Jan. 28, 2014)Plaintiff NJ PURE sued defendants for false advertising under the Lanham Act, libel, slander, and violations of the NJ Insurance Trade Practices Act; the court dismissed only the last. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 6:14 am
Holding that their duties did not require the independent judgment and discretion necessary, the Court held that Plaintiffs were non-exempt under the FLSA. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 5:13 am
Interveners and defendant each presented separate motions for judgment in their favor, respectively, non obstante veredicto. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:38 am
On the evidence, the non-disclosure of this material fact had induced the insurers to enter the transaction. [read post]
