Search for: "North Dakota v. Minnesota" Results 141 - 160 of 301
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2016, 2:06 pm by John Floyd
Currently pending before the Supreme Court are consolidated cases from Minnesota and North Dakota—under the title of Birchfield v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 4:38 am by SHG
McCarthy defends North Dakota, insisting that it has a “lack of resources and manpower. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:51 pm by CJLF Staff
  CJLF filed an amicus brief in one of the North Dakota cases, Beylund v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:45 am by Andrew Hamm
North Dakota, Bernard v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
This morning the Court will hear oral argument in a challenge to Minnesota and North Dakota laws that make it a crime for a driver suspected of drunk driving to refuse a chemical test to measure his blood-alcohol concentration. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 10:03 am by Michael Kraut
The Supreme Court consolidated appeals in three separate cases–one from Minnesota and two from North Dakota–into one case, Birchfield v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:44 am by Amy Howe
The following year, Danny Birchfield of North Dakota found himself in a similar predicament. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
North Dakota, and Beylund v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:13 pm
That is, the government's accommodation would work in most states but not in Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, and North and South Dakota — the 8th Circuit. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That would leave the rather bizarre effect that the mandate was in effect in much of the nation, but not in the seven states that are located in the Eighth Circuit: Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, and North and South Dakota. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:30 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Palmer v. 999 Quebec, Inc, a case from the Supreme Court of North Dakota, involved a plaintiff who was born in 1955 and was raised in Duluth, Minnesota. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 4:14 pm by William Weinberg
Just last month (December 2015) The United States Supreme Court agreed to hear cases from Minnesota and North Dakota where refusing a chemical test upon an arrest for DUI is charged as a crime separate from the driving under the influence charge. [read post]