Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE"
Results 141 - 160
of 646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2014, 6:11 am
Because an employee’s state law claim was based on the same facts as the claim she brought under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, an amendment to that Act invalidated an arbitration agreement she signed as applied to both claims, a federal district court in Arkansas held. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] More in the Saga of the Escaped Cat, Here Meowing About "a Russian/Israeli Oligarch"
24 Aug 2020, 3:31 pm
In today's decision by Judge Ronnie Abrams (S.D.N.Y.) in Rollag v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:54 am
In 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley law (SOX) was passed in wake of the Enron and Worldcom scandals, and the Senate Judiciary Committee stated in its final legislative report that the Passaic Valley standard protecting any “non-frivolous” report should control in a Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower case. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:53 am
Date: December 31, 2019 On December 16, 2019 Petitioner Erin Daly filed a petition for writ of certiorari to have the United States Supreme Court review the 2nd Circuit ruling of Daly v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:38 am
TweetIn Feldman v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:15 pm
In Sylvester v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am
Applying Stack and Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, the judge at first instance accepted this contention, stating that he had to consider what was just and fair between the parties having regard to the whole course of dealing between them. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm
In State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:42 am
PCAOB (appointments clause challenge to Sarbanes-Oxley), and Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 5:15 am
Indeed, the failure of that revolution may, in part, be responsible for some of the federal intervention into state corporate law wrought by the Sarbanes Oxley Act.The old "conventional wisdom" had been that, under the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 12:29 pm
Such cases include law suits that cross state lines, actions by the Internal Revenue Service, violations of federal compliance regulations (such as HIPAA and Sarbanes-Oxley), immigration cases, and more. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:43 am
Recently, a federal appeals court held in Murray v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:50 am
United States, No. 13-7451, in which the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley act's prohibition against the destruction of evidence applies to a fisherman who tossed a couple of allegedly undersized red grouper overboard before federal agents could seize the piscatorial evidence. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:48 am
By a 3-2 vote on a major case, the Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board (ARB) has limited the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) whistleblower protection outside the boundaries of the United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 6:06 am
United States, No. 13-7451. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:39 pm
§ 1514A; Lawson v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:09 am
In the case Lindsey Gulden and Damian Burch v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:43 am
Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in Murray v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 2:41 am
That is what led to yesterday's decision in Allen v. [read post]
