Search for: "Officer Paulsen" Results 141 - 158 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2010, 2:39 am by atussey@mortgagefraudblog.com
Randy Allen, Clint Paulsen, and Travis Smith, who operated HomeModifier, Post Falls, Idaho, a mortgage modification company, are prohibited from engaging in loan modification activities with Idaho consumerssigned a consent judgment that prevents them from opening a new mortgage modification business in Idaho.HomeModifer and its owners also agreed to pay $7,000 in restitution to reimburse the six consumers who complained to the Attorney General's office. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:42 am by Mandelman
The whole thing got me to thinking… this must be awfully confusing to John Paulsen and the guys at Goldman. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:13 pm
" In re Paulsen, 30 F.3d 1475, 1479 (Fed. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 8:24 am by Michelle D. Weghorst
Professional Office AssistantWe are seeking a dependable, reliable, well-organized individual to fill the position of Office Assistant.Qualifications:Must possess a pleasant and professional image. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 09-356 Title: Paulsen v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 2:23 pm
What more could be wrong with an ethics office's actions? [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 10:38 am
I also disagree with Mike Paulsen that reciting the words of the presidential oath with "faithfully" in the wrong place is unimportant. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 3:33 pm
Then-Professor Stephen Breyer, in his Nov. 28, 1973 letter to Senator Robert Byrd, conceded that he was not offering "an expert opinion" and had "not researched the question" but, with that proviso, nonetheless opined that any pay raise enacted for a given office by Congress would automatically signal an augmentation of the status and prestige attached to the office in question -- an augmentation that undoing the pay raise could not negate, given the odds that a… [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 3:27 pm
The former site quotes Michael Paulsen's suggestion that the text is clear and that Clinton is barred. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 3:24 pm
  [Here's a good post on this issue from Michael Stokes Paulsen at Balkinization.] [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 12:09 pm
In such case, should we amend the oath of office to say that "I will always do whatever I believe necessary to defend the country," or is Mike Paulsen correct that this is what the oath, correctly interpreted, already means? [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 12:56 pm
UPDATE:  As someone notes in the comments, Professor Paulsen has a very thorough discussion of this issue on Balkinization. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
(See Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Emancipation Proclamation and the Commander in Chief Power, 40 Georgia L. [read post]
14 May 2007, 10:04 am
Hat tips to CreditBloggers and my research assistant, Jeff Paulsen for pointing the way to this story. [read post]