Search for: "One Balance, Inc." Results 141 - 160 of 5,460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2018, 11:56 am by Staff Attorney
According to BrokerCheck Records, Curtis has been subject to 6 customer disputes, one of which is still pending. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 1:51 am by Jeroen Willekens
Although the standard of balance of probabilities has occasionally been paraphrased as meaning that one has to assess whether one set of facts is more likely to be true than the other (see T 381/87, OJ EPO 1990, 213, point 4.4.b)), such a literal interpretation of "balance" does not, in the Board's view, properly reflect the long-standing judicial practice of the boards of appeal in determining whether a particular piece of information has become… [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 1:50 am
Winning as in one customer is dead and the other is nowhere to be found. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:53 am by Samantha G. Wilson
Konami Digital Entertainment Inc., et al., C.A. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:35 pm by Brian D. Moore
  He made one payment and then sent AmeriCredit the note stamped with the words “Accepted for value and returned for value for settlement and closure” and directed AmeriCredit to bill the balance to the U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:02 am
Take for example, the pharmaceuticals case of Cephalon Inc v Orchid Europe Ltd [2010] EWHC 2945 (Pat) [briefly noted on PatLit here] in which Floyd J (as he was) treated the issue of who is likely to suffer the most irreparable harm as the key factor in the balance of convenience assessment itself: "Balance of convenienceThere is no dispute as to the approach which I should apply. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:30 am by Bryan West
Facts Jazz Resources Inc. is a publicly-traded junior mining company that owned a mineral tenure in B.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:02 am by Docket Navigator
Petition for Inter Partes Review by Apple Inc., IPR2013-00348 (PTAB February 12, 2014, Order) (Easthom, APJ) [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 4:17 am
After the jury found defendant A10 Networks ("A10") liable for misappropriation of trade secrets and infringement of patents owned by Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al ("Brocade"), the court entered two permanent injunctions against A10, one that prohibited additional patent infringement and another that applied to the misappropriation of trade secrets. [read post]