Search for: "Only A Mile v State"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2014, 6:00 pm
The Court in Michigan v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
Estis Well Service, 768 F.3d 382 (5th Cir. 2014) held that punitive damages were not available under the rationale of an earlier Supreme Court case, Miles v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:57 pm
Wade (1973), Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:00 pm
Casey entitles a court to preliminarily enjoin a state abortion law—which mandates a “contracted physician” with hospital admitting privileges that effectively bans medication abortion, offers no discernible medical benefit, and leaves only one remaining abortion provider hundreds of miles away from significant population centers—without making a concrete estimate of the number of women who would be prevented or postponed in having an abortion.… [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:51 am
In Moreno v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:45 pm
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
On the night of August 24, 2013, the father received an email from the mother stating that she and the children had moved from East Hampton to Westhampton Beach—a distance of about 32 miles. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:34 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 8:01 am
The China Coast Guard vessel turned away when the news crew was around 80 nautical miles from the Philippines’ mainland Palawan island, only to be replaced by two PLA Navy Houbeis. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:11 am
Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 3:30 am
Miles, 13 CR 1158, NYLJ 1202650972620 (2nd Cir. 2014), citing U.S. v. [read post]
26 May 2007, 8:03 am
Schumm v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
The Court agreed to review the first question only. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:20 am
In the Raulerson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:20 am
In the Raulerson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 1:19 pm
In PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 12:50 pm
The federal district court in Colorado v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:00 am
In the case of Bonacci v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:01 am
The United States Supreme Court, in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm
Claims can be brought under federal common law for public nuisance only when the courts are 'compelled to consider federal questions which cannot be answered from federal statutes alone.' [citing: City of Milwaukee v. [read post]