Search for: "Order for Rehearing"
Results 141 - 160
of 4,185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
FERC considered and responded to some, but not all of these arguments, in a rehearing order issued on July 3, 2023 (“Rehearing Order”). [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:58 am
” In other words, you can’t challenge a rehearing order by itself. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Circuit Court of Appeals to set aside controversial precedent in order to hold Instagram liable for copyright infringement. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 2:08 am
Department of Labor, an interested party in the case—will ask the full Sixth Circuit to reconsider the decision, known as a rehearing en banc. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:31 am
Circuit did not resolve Petitioners’ challenge to the deadlock order on the merits, but sent it back for FERC to reconsider Petitioners’ rehearing request, because FERC erred in finding the rehearing petition untimely. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
Bush appointee, and there was a concurrence ordered by Judge Sidney Thomas, who is a Clinton appointee. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Apple had asked the court to rehear the case in order to direct the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to narrow the services listed in the trademark application so that it could proceed to registration. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Apple had asked the court to rehear the case in order to direct the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to narrow the services listed in the trademark application so that it could proceed to registration. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:00 am
The main question raised in the petition for rehearing—and in the court’s order granting that petition—is the continuing viability of the Rosen primary reference requirement for evaluating whether a design is obvious under § 103. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:31 am
Attorneys for the trucking company argued in a motion for a rehearing that a judge should have instructed the jury to consider evidence suggesting a faulty signal and defective crossing gate could have contributed to the collision on U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:13 am
In October 2022, the Fifth Circuit denied the SEC’s petition for en banc rehearing of the case. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:53 am
Plus, the SEC's order dismissing certain proceedings does not encompass Jarkesy, since a final order has been entered. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:08 am
Local officials sought a rehearing on ODonnell I. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
The taxpayers in Moore (and the Ninth Circuit judges who dissented from the denial of rehearing en banc) argue that some concept of realization is necessarily a part of the original meaning of income—i.e., that there must be some act of separation or conversion of property into cash or other property in order for there to be income. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:41 am
Here's my post from February, when the Fifth Circuit decided the case (see also Stephen Halbrook's post after the denial of en banc rehearing, where he noted that Supreme Court review was likely): From U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm
Walton, the 1984 case cited by the Sixth Circuit (it's Vicory, not "Viceroy," as Judge Kethledge mistakenly spelled it), isn't much of a precedent, because it was merely a denial of a petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:23 am
Following Broadview’s request for rehearing, the Commission set aside its prior order and granted Broadview’s application, determining that § 796(17)(A) was “ambiguous as to the proper measure of a facility’s power production capacity” and that the former send-out approach was the best interpretation because “it takes into account all of the facility’s components working together, not just the maximum capacity of one subcomponent, and… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:06 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit rejected that argument and denied rehearing, over a dissent by Judge Patrick Bumatay that was joined by three other judges. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am
” The court of appeals denied the Moores’ petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:42 am
The North Carolina appeals court will look for errors of law or procedure[1]; it does not rehear evidence or question whether it would agree with the lower court’s decision. [read post]