Search for: "Oxley, in Re"
Results 141 - 160
of 475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
Here at the Suits by Suits Western Hemisphere Nerve Center, we’re anxiously preparing for our Thanksgiving Day celebration. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:28 pm
Frye Regional's co-defendant re-served the same document requests to which the County had already responded, demanding labelling. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
Further, FCPA investigations by the SEC and DOJ increasingly stem from companies voluntarily disclosing potential violations as required under their Sarbanes Oxley obligations. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm
Broker returned to work with a new firm in August of 2008 after Massachusetts allowed him to re-register with the state. [read post]
23 May 2013, 4:23 am
This provision was required to be adopted by Congress in Section 306 of Sarbanes-Oxley to address the issue that employees of Enron had when they couldn't sell company securities because of a change in employee benefit plan administrators and Enron's share price was dropping significantly. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:18 am
Break out the Sarbanes-Oxley treatise: The grant in “one-time” relist Lawson v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
Cliett, 12-773, the Ninth Circuit state-on-top habeas case we’re still getting to know. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:00 am
Scott London Subverted Sarbanes-Oxley: Big Four Mock Audit Partner Rotation in re: The Auditors The rest of the column goes on to explain that London seems to have subverted the intent of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 203 that requires lead engagement partner rotation off engagements to promote objectivity, independence and professional skepticism. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:00 am
Scott London Subverted Sarbanes-Oxley: Big Four Mock Audit Partner Rotation in re: The Auditors The rest of the column goes on to explain that London seems to have subverted the intent of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 203 that requires lead engagement partner rotation off engagements to promote objectivity, independence and professional skepticism. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:00 am
Scott London Subverted Sarbanes-Oxley: Big Four Mock Audit Partner Rotation in re: The Auditors The rest of the column goes on to explain that London seems to have subverted the intent of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 203 that requires lead engagement partner rotation off engagements to promote objectivity, independence and professional skepticism. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:40 pm
We’re happy to announce that Epstein Becker Green’s Whistleblowing & Compliance Law Blog has joined our blog. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:40 pm
We’re happy to announce that Epstein Becker Green’s Whistleblowing & Compliance Law Blog has joined our blog. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 11:04 am
If you're working in an area of law, you can download the statutes you refer to most often. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 12:33 am
Since the enactment of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, CEOs and CFOs have been providing certifications with respect to their company’s internal controls. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 7:23 am
Sarbanes-Oxley? [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
Case In Point - http://bit.ly/HM288p (Tom Fishburne) Technology and Tactics3 Steps for Compliance With the SEC’s Conflict Minerals Rule – http://bit.ly/P5E8g3 (Alexandra Wrange) An Interesting Framework For Information Governance - http://bit.ly/Tvbn2B (Barry Murphy) Big Data’s Human Component – Harvard Business Review - http://bit.ly/PeXS0G (Jim Stikeleather) DOJ Is Prosecuting Customs Fraud Through Sarbanes-Oxley’s… [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 6:23 am
Sham governance, cronyism, and meddling In Part 1, I mocked the faint praise BCG struggled to bestow upon NYCHA’s board: If 90% of life is just showing up, then NYCHA must be scoring 90% The absence of achievements is bad enough – more damning still is this exposition of how the board is wrongly constituted: We’re not a board, we’re a cabal – and what’s wrong with that? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:53 am
Every fall since I first started writing this blog, I have assembled a list of the current hot topics in the world of directors’ and officers’ liability. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Res. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:59 pm
--Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
