Search for: "Oxley v. Oxley"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2010, 2:59 pm
On December 7, 2009, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 12:59 pm
Burgess v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
The case, Lawson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:43 pm
The Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Yes, the Supreme Court held today in Lawson v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 2:01 pm
The language of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act at issue in the Murray v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 10:17 am
The language of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act at issue in the Murray v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:11 pm
In a June 28, 2010 decision (here), the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:19 am
Lawyer's Dismissal Was Not Unlawful Retaliation Under Sarbanes-Oxley Act A former general counsel did not suffer unlawful retaliation under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, concluded a federal district court (DC Md, Harkness v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Murray v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:00 am
The case is Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 3:15 pm
SEC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 9:46 pm
Discrimination/Retaliation*Garcia v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
(O'Mahony v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:28 am
Lawson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:54 pm
The case is Tides v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
The first decision, Villanueva v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 3:22 pm
With its recent decision in Spinner v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 4:00 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 5:00 pm
By a 2-1 decision, the PCAOB is constitutional, upholding the one provision of Sarbanes Oxley that has been challenged. [read post]
