Search for: "P. v. Garcia" Results 141 - 160 of 310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm by Jon Sands
  Such petitions are subject to dismissal, see Rose v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
JUANITA PEREZ, VIRGINIA GARCIA, PAUL ZAPATA, AND SYLVIA SANCHEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ALL HEIRS OF ELISA ZAPATA, DECEASED; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-13-00111-CV,406 SW3d 313, 06-26-13) 13-0576 THE WILLIAMSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm by Andy
And as I predicted elsewhere, Judge Kozinski then came to the Garcia v Google case. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Garcia, 315 P.3d 117 (Cal. 2014), that an otherwise-qualified undocumented immigrant who is present in the United States without lawful authorization, may be admitted to the California bar. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:41 pm
For those who thought that the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had embraced a new theory of copyright in Garcia v Google in February 2014 (here), such expectations were disappointed last month when the Court reversed its decision, denying Garcia's copyright interest in her acting performance within the highly controversial video Innocence of Muslims.In brief, actress Cindy Lee Garcia, right, featured a five-second clip for a film entitled… [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
When confronted with a copy of the text message, Father admitted that he had sent the text "to let A.L. know that he was no longer in Applebee's where they were having a meal and had moved to the Barnes and Noble as he prefers using their toilet" (Plaintiff's #6 at p.6). [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
When confronted with a copy of the text message, Father admitted that he had sent the text "to let A.L. know that he was no longer in Applebee's where they were having a meal and had moved to the Barnes and Noble as he prefers using their toilet" (Plaintiff's #6 at p.6). [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
When confronted with a copy of the text message, Father admitted that he had sent the text "to let A.L. know that he was no longer in Applebee's where they were having a meal and had moved to the Barnes and Noble as he prefers using their toilet" (Plaintiff's #6 at p.6). [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]