Search for: "P. v. Long" Results 141 - 160 of 7,082
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am by Alessandro Cerri
 Kat doesn't mind who made the sweater as long as it's warm... [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Skinner, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Monday, February 5, 2024 Tags: Activism, anti-ESG, ESG, ESG investing, ExxonMobil, GHG, proxy statements, SEC 2024 Proxy Season Considerations: Officer Exculpation for Delaware Corporations Posted by Andrew Allen, Karen Dempsey, and Bobby Bee, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, on Tuesday, February 6, 2024 Tags: delaware, Delaware Supreme Court, Duty of care, Fiduciary duties, officer exculpation, officers, Proxy season, S&P 500, stockholders … [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Skinner, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Monday, February 5, 2024 Tags: Activism, anti-ESG, ESG, ESG investing, ExxonMobil, GHG, proxy statements, SEC 2024 Proxy Season Considerations: Officer Exculpation for Delaware Corporations Posted by Andrew Allen, Karen Dempsey, and Bobby Bee, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, on Tuesday, February 6, 2024 Tags: delaware, Delaware Supreme Court, Duty of care, Fiduciary duties, officer exculpation, officers, Proxy season, S&P 500, stockholders … [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
Not long after ratification in 1869, Chief Justice Salmon P. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:52 am by Frank Cranmer
As set out by Elias P [at 45] in McClintock v Department of Constitutional Affairs [2008] IRLR 29  it is not enough ‘to have an opinion based on some real or perceived logic or based on information or lack of information available’. ii. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  This is also the underlying constitutional question in the Supreme Court's Moore v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
https://protectthewild.substack.com/p/new-animation-end-hare-coursing   Recent Extinctions Within the US States & Territories - A cause for concern. [read post]