Search for: "P. v. Patterson"
Results 141 - 160
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2010, 7:40 am
[PDF] I guess this footnote [PDF] from Judge Robert P. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 4:44 am
In Sears v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:12 pm
Patterson [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:07 pm
Gregory P. [read post]
26 May 2010, 1:40 pm
For purposes of preemption, “it is the activity being regulated rather than the actor who is being regulated that matters …” On May 25, 2010, the Court of Appeals published its opinion in Patterson v Citifinancial Mortgage Corp, No. 287370, affirming the trial court’s decision that plaintiffs’ claims against a national bank regarding mortgage transactions were preempted under federal law. [read post]
9 May 2010, 1:36 pm
Gregory P. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Patterson, News and Record, April 24, 2010 Fifteen neighborhoods in Guilford and Rockingham counties will benefit from a settlement between the Environmental Protection Agency and Hovnanian Enterprises, one of the nation’s largest home builders. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
Graham v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm
(See p. 5 of Scheduling Order, PDF). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:22 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court heard Magwood v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:00 am
,(EUI Working Papers LAW No. 2009/18, Dec. 1, 2009).Juliet P. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:58 am
Pugh (213) 617-4284 JPugh@sheppardmullin.com and David P. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:59 am
P'ship, 198 P.3d 615 (Haw., Dec. 24, 2008) (proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on remand). [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 11:07 am
City of Patterson (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 886 By David P. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 11:07 am
City of Patterson (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 886 By David P. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:51 am
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:51 am
”Patterson v. [read post]
