Search for: "PARKS V. CITIZENS PROPERTY"
Results 141 - 160
of 587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm
., v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 6:24 am
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:13 am
" In Illinois v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:45 pm
Citing Bailey v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:51 am
Kelo greatly shook every property owner’s security in this fundamental right; it is now time for state legislatures to respond accordingly to re-instill confidence for every citizen. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit 1987) (suspect who fled unlocked vehicle parked on public road abandoned expectation of privacy); see also Kurtz v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Kennedy, announcing his opinion and the Court’s ruling in Salazar, et al., v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 11:51 am
Fedorenko v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
Well done, LexisNexis Butterworths, for unearthing Knight v Beyond Properties Pty Ltd and others [2007] EWHC 1251 (Ch), an obscure ruling by Mr Justice David Richards in the Chancery Division yesterday on a neat little passing-off point.Knight, a British citizen who lived in Australia, published three books in the UK between 1991 and 1996; each had the word 'Mythbusters' in its title. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:32 am
Popadopoulos v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 9:48 pm
[*P27] The State argues that we have held that police officers are privileged to be on private property while in the performance of their official duties, citing State v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:47 pm
In Sullivan, a white property owner was kicked out of his property association after complaining that the association wouldn’t allow a black person, who’d bought the plaintiff’s property, to use the association’s private park. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 10:22 am
Abbott South County Citizens for Smart Growth v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 11:16 pm
Corp v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 1:00 am
Owners of Lech Family Home Appeal to Higher Federal Court In Lech v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 6:22 am
A citizen informant is presumed reliable under Tennessee's Aguilar-Spinelli standard. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 9:21 pm
In a dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc, Judge McConnell argued that the Pioneer Park “monuments constitute government speech”; Pleasant Grove had not, “by word or deed, invite[d] private citizens to erect monuments of their own choosing in these parks. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 11:32 am
From Thursday’s Desertrain v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:43 am
Caetano v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:23 pm
In the Pleasant Grove City case, the issue is the scope of the right of a private group to display a permanent religious monument on government property, including a public park, if the government entity responsible has accepted other objects donated by other private individuals or groups. [read post]
