Search for: "PEARCE v. STATE" Results 141 - 160 of 163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 10:43 am
Transocean, 2:10-cv-01222, US District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana (New Orleans) and Cooper v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:38 pm by Barry Eagar
McLelland J. did not state any exhaustive test. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:04 am by LRToday
  On March 23, 2010, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in New Process Steel v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:57 pm by AALRR
This has resulted in a backlog of unresolved cases pending before the NLRB and in a case pending before the United States Supreme Court calling for the Supreme Court to decide whether the National Labor Relations Act permits the NLRB to act when there are only two sitting members of the NLRB, New Process Steel v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 4:34 pm
Posted by Philip Miles, an employment lawyer with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:36 am
At the moment, the law across Europe about how to decide what is and is not patentable is not settled, even though the same law should effectively apply in all member states of the EPC (comprising all 27 EU states together with a few other non-EU states). [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:49 am
Pearce Corp., (1928 Minn.) 217 N.W. 374 (operator of roller coaster held to highest degree of care equivalent to that of a common carrier); Cooper v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Buie, No. 070258 Sentence of fifteen years for being a felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed where: 1) because the maximum penalty for the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty was ten years or more under state statute, defendant's state felony narcotics conviction qualified as a "serious drug offense" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA); and 2) defendant's allegation that he was deprived of counsel at his plea hearing did not state a… [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Pearce    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0240p.06 2008/07/03 USA v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Pearce    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0240p.06 2008/07/03 USA v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:18 pm
Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969), retroactively to Payne's case, and held that Pearce would not apply to errors occurring before Pearce was decided. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Clark, 504 N.W.2d 292, 300 (Neb. 1993) ("filing a personal injury claim waives the physician-patient privilege as to all the information concerning the health and medical history relevant to the matters which plaintiff has put at issue"); Pearce v. [read post]