Search for: "PH v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2018, 1:43 pm by Mark Ashton
By August, 2015 the marriage had soured and Mother wanted to return to Pennsylvania to complete her Ph. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:22 am by Lawfare Staff
  Analysis, Commentary, and Additional Information With a ruling in the Republic of the Philippines v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:24 am by Ashley Morgan
Based on the November 2017 guidance, the FDA determined that amniotic fluid falls under Section 351 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:01 pm
PHS Community Services Society v. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm by David
Mesh devices that we are reviewing for Hernia Mesh victims in 2020: Ethicon: Physiomesh Proceed Prolene Hernia System (PHS) Prolene  (not reviewing these cases at this time. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:29 am by Peter Mahler
First, quoting from its recent opinion in PH-105 Realty Corp. v Elayaan, the court noted that tax estoppel applies where “the party seeking to contradict the factual statements as to ownership in the tax returns signed the tax returns, and has failed to assert any basis for not crediting the statements. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 3:34 am by Kurt R. Karst
”  The bill proposes to amend FDC Act § 505(b) and PHS Act § 351(a)(2) with respect to patent information submitted to FDA for Orange Book and Purple Book listing. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 12:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Santa Fe Tobacco also adds menthol to certain varieties; the cigarettes are also “flue-cured,” meaning processed with heat to secure the sugars, which synthetically lowers the cigarette smoke’s pH and makes it easier to inhale. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 5:55 am by Kian Vesteinsson
This is no small feat, given the track record for human rights in some ASEAN member states. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:02 am by Gilles Cuniberti
C v C (Ancillary Relief: Nuptial Settlement) [2004] EWCA Civ 1030, [2005] Fam 250, at para 31. 104. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:24 am by Peter J. Sluka
Sup Ct, New York County 2017]), a unilateral mistake of one party is “not enough to rewrite an agreement that is complete on its face” (Resort Sports Network Inc. v PH Ventures III, LLC, 67 AD3d 132, 136 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]