Search for: "POHL v. POHL"
Results 141 - 160
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2013, 8:56 am
Al-Bihani v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 2:31 pm
The defense relied on the 2008 case of Boumediene v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:09 am
Judge James Pohl has set forth 23 motions for argument: a. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:30 am
Additionally, a motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:05 am
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm
Judge Pohl seemed interested in these defense concerns and asked Mr. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:41 am
Pohl: the military commission in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
Well, have a look at Judge Pohl’s order regarding hearing procedures. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:35 am
Pohl issued an amended docketing order in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:32 am
Judge Pohl’s docketing order, in which he adjusts the calendar in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:30 am
Judge James Pohl has tweaked the calendar in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:18 pm
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins released a statement following the completion of yesterday’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
And, the prosecutor continues, Al-Nashiri’s is just as robustly staffed as the defense was in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:36 pm
Reviewing the docket in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:33 am
Judge James Pohl has denied two motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:19 pm
And what better way to top things off, than with a quick update in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:14 am
So reports Carol Rosenberg of the Miami Herald: Judge Pohl has set another hearing in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:54 am
Pohl give evidence. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:32 am
The latest statement from the defense in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
