Search for: "PRICE v. ROBERTS et al"
Results 141 - 160
of 191
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 am
Robert Peters, et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, Michael E. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
Comcast has been losing hundreds of thousands of subscribers each year to its competitors, such as satellite television providers who are able to offer their channel packages at lower prices. [32] Additionally, suppliers like NBCU and Walt Disney have been charging higher prices as broadcasters like FOX and CBS have declared an intention to start charging for their programs. [33] Comcast is losing business rapidly to selective, cheaper programs on the internet. [34] NBC, too, has… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
By using futures, oil companies reduce their exposure to price volatility in a specific transaction and plan future purchases and sales of its inventory. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
By using futures, oil companies reduce their exposure to price volatility in a specific transaction and plan future purchases and sales of its inventory. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 12:28 pm
Ryska et al, Case No. 09-cv-02093 (D. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
For those of you who haven't been following the story, here's a brief recap, shamelessly borrowing from William's prior posts: Jones, et al., were investors in mutual funds managed by Harris Associates, an investment adviser. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
Roberts, et al., Respondents, vTishman Speyer Properties, L.P., et al., Appellants. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
HICKS, ET AL.; from Anderson County;14th district (14? [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1986) (describing the analytical method as "subtract[ing] the infringer's usual or acceptable net profit from its anticipated net profit realized from sales of infringing devices"); see also John Skenyon et al., Patent Damages Law & Practice § 3:4, at 3-9 to 3-10 (2008) (describing the analytical method as "calculating damages based on the infringer's own internal profit projections for the infringing item at the time… [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
On September 3, 2009, twenty-five corporate law and finance professors and scholars - including several contributors to this blog - filed an amici curiae brief in the case of Jones et al. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:19 am
Competition is multi-dimensional: Ex ante v. ex post, price, quality, service, innovation, etc. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 8:59 am
Scott and White Memorial Hospital, et al. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 11:06 pm
News America Inc., et al., No. 2:2006-cv-10240 (E.D. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
New Director of Enforcement Division and More Changes In February, Chairman Schapiro announced the appointment of Robert Khuzami, a former federal prosecutor and investment bank general counsel, as the new Director of the Division of Enforcement. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:18 pm
Pubco Corp., et al., Del. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 2:34 am
Prenka Ivezaj et al., defendants-appellants
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
Commissioner Rosch v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:07 am
The new case is El Paso County, et al., v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 7:05 am
Roberts, Jr., wrote for the Court in Pacific Bell, et al., v. linkLine Communications (07-512). [read post]
