Search for: "PROFESSORS OF SECOND AMENDMENT LAW" Results 141 - 160 of 4,859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 1:45 pm
Professor Jill Lepore's Jorde lecture paints a rich portrait of state constitutional conventions as engines of democratization during the 1800s and issues a dire warning about the United States' ongoing amendment drought. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:44 pm by Christine Corcos
Professor Jill Lepore's Jorde lecture paints a rich portrait of state constitutional conventions as engines of democratization during the 1800s and issues a dire warning about the United States' ongoing amendment drought. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Amar's research assistants at Yale Law School (Arshan Barzani, Samarth Desai, Jacob Hutt, and Jordan Kei-Rahn), which I am glad to do; all that follows below is their work: [* * *] We are research assistants to Professor Akhil Reed Amar at Yale Law School. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Will Baude
Even in such situations, however, a reviewing court typically will not "second-guess the [trial judge] on the credibility of witnesses. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
  On Tuesday, Keisler and Bernstein published a guest post on the Election Law Blog. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  And in the post after that one, I’ll address the remaining argument raised by the CRSCC (and some amici), which is based upon the First Amendment rights of Trump supporters in Colorado. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Second, Holley's statement that "Newman had written [that a classmate] died from the Covid-19 vaccine" was substantially true. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am by fjhinojosa
Nancy Soonpaa’s article Stress in Law Students: A Comparative Study of First Year, Second-Year, and Third-Year Students was cited in the following article: Sam Barder & Jennifer K. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:54 am by Will Baude
  In particular, we must take issue with some serious flaws contained in Professor Kurt Lash's recent writings on this topic, which he has presented in a draft law-review article, titled "The Meaning and Ambiguity of Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment," and, in a more telescoped form, as an online essay at the Law and Liberty website, titled "The Fourteenth Amendment's Ambiguous Section Three. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:21 pm by Steve Bainbridge
  (Full disclosure:  I represent some law professors pro bono as amici curiae in Dell, which is on appeal.) [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
  As we state in the article, the Second Confiscation Act "is practically a glossary of terms used in Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment proposed by Congress just four years later. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
This is the second libel action brought by the actor-turned-politician against a Twitter, now X, user who accused Fox of being racist. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Second, they acknowledged that the President obviously does not appoint himself, but countered that the Appointments Clause does not define who are the "Officers of the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am by Will Baude
Second, our article was devoted to legal analysis—an effort to ascertain the original, objective public meaning of a provision of the Constitution, as part of our must fundamental law. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:22 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Notre Dame law professor Derek Muller responds to Yoo and Delahunty in the latest issue of the Case Western Reserve Law Review, explaining why their theory is wrong. [read post]