Search for: "PS v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm by Rick
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 11:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
During this appearance, the attorney for the child stated, without submitting any evidence in support of her comments, that David was a special needs child and, as such, would not receive the services as provided for by PS 329 pursuant to his Individual Education Plan at his school in Tennessee. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For example, the Supreme Court had held that an LPA is maintainable against a judgment given by a single judge under: (a) s. 76(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1940 (National Sewing Thread Co v James Chadwick—a three-judge Bench); (b) s. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Vinita Khanolkar v Pai—a two-judge Bench); (c) s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Sharda Devi v State of Bihar—a three-judge Bench); (d) s. 299 of the Indian Succession Act,… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:56 am
physical status in 6 levels: ASA PS I - Normal healthy patient; ASA PS II - Patient with mild systemic disease; ASA PS III - Patient with severe systemic disease; ASA PS IV - Patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life; ASA PS V - Moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation; and ASA PS VI - Declared brain-dead patient whose organs are being removed for donor purposes. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:56 am
physical status in 6 levels: ASA PS I - Normal healthy patient; ASA PS II - Patient with mild systemic disease; ASA PS III - Patient with severe systemic disease; ASA PS IV - Patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life; ASA PS V - Moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation; and ASA PS VI - Declared brain-dead patient whose organs are being removed for donor purposes. [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:41 am
PS: Scalia wrote the lone dissent in favor of Montana and against Wyomingites/Wyomans in this state v. state lawsuit. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:41 am by sarelson
PS: Scalia wrote the lone dissent in favor of Montana and against Wyomingites/Wyomans in this state v. state lawsuit. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:43 am by Charon QC
Have a good week Best, as always Charon (PS… do you like my Green ink…? [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 7:17 am by lawmrh
See, for instance, “The Case for Partisan Judicial Elections”, “Voters v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:17 pm by Gideon
[PS: I was really, really tempted to add another: She Who Must Not Be Named v. [read post]