Search for: "Paine v. Paine"
Results 141 - 160
of 12,006
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
You’re forbidden to remove/alter information at pain of $2500/violation. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
To the contrary, Trump’s brief goes to pains to sharply distinguish the “office under” language in the Positions Clause from the slightly different “officer of the United States” terminology in the “Officials Clause,” and tries to exploit that difference in order to argue that the latter, middle clause must describe a narrower class of offices than the former. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Rees, Glossip v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
So one might think, but in the 2015 case of Glossip v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
This often results in a tug of war between the two dogs over the hare which unsurprisingly causes immense pain and suffering to the terrified animal being ripped to pieces. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* See Matter of DeFazio v DiNapoli, 211 AD3d 1254, and Matter of Frederick v New York State Comptroller, 204 AD3d 1292.** See Matter of Pirrone v Town of Wallkill, 6 AD3d 447, in which the Appellate Division addressed the recommendation of a hearing officer's finding that the individual was required to undergo spinal fusion surgery or forfeit General Municipal Law §207-c disability retirement benefits. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* See Matter of DeFazio v DiNapoli, 211 AD3d 1254, and Matter of Frederick v New York State Comptroller, 204 AD3d 1292.** See Matter of Pirrone v Town of Wallkill, 6 AD3d 447, in which the Appellate Division addressed the recommendation of a hearing officer's finding that the individual was required to undergo spinal fusion surgery or forfeit General Municipal Law §207-c disability retirement benefits. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 5:00 pm
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:39 am
McCall v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 11:22 am
Smith maintains that he endured repeated needle insertions during this period, all while experiencing severe pain. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am
But they do so in a torturous manner, causing burning, searing pain. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:06 am
In Vilas v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Ct. 513 (2008); Galipault v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:36 am
The trial judge reduced the pain and suffering award to $700,000 ($250,000 past, $450,000 future) and the reduction to $700,000 was affirmed on appeal in Sinera v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 6:05 am
It is a 1997 opinion styled, Annette Riner; Suzette Marriott v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 3:20 pm
Following California Supreme Court and its own case law precedent, the Second District, Division Five, has ruled in Guerrero et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:25 pm
Among the drugs with accepted medical uses, those in schedule II have the greatest potential for abuse and those in schedule V the least. [read post]
