Search for: "Paul Oven"
Results 141 - 160
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2011, 9:21 am
Industrial sabotage in 1812 PG&E spokesman Paul Moreno said the utility has been examining possible opt-out options for the past few months in anticipation of such an order and that PG&E is prepared to meet the two-week deadline. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm
Levan decision stands for the proposition that where liability is conceded (and where no punitive damages claims are at issue), evidence of a defendant driver's intoxication at the time of an accident is not admissible.I send thanks to Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic, PA office of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:37 am
Mahan a third year law student at Widener and a law clerk at the Harrisburg law firm of Handler, Henning & Rosenberg, LLP, Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg law firm of Schmidt Kramer, and Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic, Pennsylvania law firm of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing these cases to my attention. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:37 am
Mahan a third year law student at Widener and a law clerk at the Harrisburg law firm of Handler, Henning & Rosenberg, LLP, Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg law firm of Schmidt Kramer, and Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic, Pennsylvania law firm of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing these cases to my attention. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:32 am
The Plaintiff also abandoned a negligence asserting claim asserting that the carrier had acted negligently in handling the UIM claim presented.This case evidences a push-back by carriers, in the form of filing 12(b)(6) motions in federal court and preliminary objections in state court, in response to being faced with multiple claims at the outset in post-Koken cases, some of which claims may be arguably premature or even inapplicable under the circumstances presented.It remains to be seen whether… [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:32 am
The Plaintiff also abandoned a negligence asserting claim asserting that the carrier had acted negligently in handling the UIM claim presented.This case evidences a push-back by carriers, in the form of filing 12(b)(6) motions in federal court and preliminary objections in state court, in response to being faced with multiple claims at the outset in post-Koken cases, some of which claims may be arguably premature or even inapplicable under the circumstances presented.It remains to be seen whether… [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 5:24 am
MORE: Reader Paul Carlson writes: “For metal cans of food, write down the contents on the lid with a magic marker. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:16 pm
Rion’s client, China Arnold was convicted of putting her baby in the microwave oven. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:07 am
Nationwide (Sackett III).The opinion in Sackett III held that the trial court correctly decided on remand that a vehicle was not added under a newly/after acquired vehicle clause in an insurance policy and that the insurer therefore should have had the insured sign a new rejection of stacking form in order for non-stacking to apply when adding an additional car to a two car policy.It remains to be seen whether the carrier will attempt to bring this matter up to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.I thank… [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
SCHNEIDER, PAUL S. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:29 am
Sackett was entitled to stacking.The Sackett III decision can be viewed online at http://www.aopc.org/OpPosting/Superior/out/a14005_10.pdf.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer for publicizing this Opinion and to Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic, PA office of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:16 am
§1702) does not contain a prejudice requirement in this context.The prevailing Plaintiff's attorney in Vanderhoff was Attorney Brian Corcoran, a solo practitioner out of Kingston, PA.A copy of the Vanderhoff majority opinion by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court can be viewed at this link:http://www.pacourts.us/OpPosting/Supreme/out/J-43-2008mo.pdf.I thank Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic office of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
As such, Judge Munley denied the defense motion in limine.An analysis of the Freed opinion here on Tort Talk can be found at this link: http://www.torttalk.com/2009/06/pennsylvania-supreme-court-reverses.htmlThe prevailing Plaintiff's attorney in this Earls decision by Judge Munley was Attorney James Conaboy of the Scranton, Pennsylvania law firm of Abrahamsen, Conaboy & Abrahamsen.Anyone desiring a copy of this Opinion and Order may contact me at dancummins@comcast.net.Thanks to Attorney… [read post]
21 May 2010, 6:11 am
I thank Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic, Pennsylvania law firm of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 10:30 pm
Pan Seared Duck Breast 1 Muscovy Duck Breast - Boneless 1 teaspoon Paul Prudhomme's Poultry Magic Seasoning Preheat oven to 350°. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:01 pm
Use oven mitts and turn pot lids outward when removing and turn pot handles inwards. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 10:46 am
LEXIS 12779 at 21 (E.D.Pa. 2009, Pratter, J.) as offering support for a punitive damages claim base upon a driver being distracted by cell phone use, the Pike County Court noted that, if discovery turned out to confirm the cell phone use and distraction, by way of cell phone records or otherwise, the plaintiff would have the right to seek to amend the Complaint in an effort to support the possibility of restating the punitive damages claim pursuant to Rule 1033.I thank Attorney Paul… [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 1:48 am
Nov. 5, 2009).I thank Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic, PA office of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing this case to my attention.This decision in Nehme is consistent with what has become the majority rule in the trial court decisions on this issue across the Commonwealth. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:18 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Leda M. [read post]
