Search for: "People in Interest of SJ"
Results 141 - 160
of 223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2013, 10:35 am
Meanwhile the jiplp poll on what people understand to be the meaning of the words "Greek yoghurt" is hovering around the 100 mark but still has the best part of three weeks to go. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 1:33 am
With nine days left to vote, the IPKat's sidebar poll on what people think of "King & Wood Mallesons SJ Berwin" as a law firm's name is currently indicating a certain lack of enthusiasm for it. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 2:54 pm
Interested readers, their friends, followers and supporters can access this series on the RSC website here. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
The CITP community is a fantastic collection of smart and funny people who work passionately on all aspects of information technology policy. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 12:37 pm
In a speech delivered to SJ Live conference delegates, District Judge Monty Trent drew a number of interesting analogies between solicitors and other jobs – airline pilots and an F1 pit crew. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:23 pm
Scalia again pointed out that the intent of these statutes was to foster visibility into government by the people that those laws governed–in this case, state residents. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
The appropriators have a vested interest, which is of course to appropriate less. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 6:34 am
If you are interested, you must register by the end of January. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 4:20 am
People like nice. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:45 am
Instead, typically, an interested external recipient is required in order to get adequate funding. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:47 am
It's not that I don't appreciate the anger, or necessarily disagree with the message, but I cannot, I will not, allow the comments at SJ to become a festering stew of angry people whose comments either chase knowledgeable people away or make people less knowledgable for having read them. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:11 am
When I started SJ, there were only a couple of people whose blogs were directed toward curation. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:16 am
I checked back to see if Neal put SJ on his blogroll. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm
One to watch for those interested in corporate accountability. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 2:37 pm
and not SJ? [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
I certainly believe that our judiciary should reflect better the changing mores of our times and the constituent peoples of our nation. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am
The online site also include an article by Professor Steven Barnett, ‘Public Interest: the public decides‘. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:49 pm
Comment Two points of particular interest arise in this case. [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:08 am
A recurring issue as new people make their way here is that posts touch upon an issue that, for whatever reason, interests them, but fails to go far enough. [read post]
4 May 2012, 4:49 am
Whenever an awkward comment is left behind at SJ, I try to take a look at who wrote it and why. [read post]
