Search for: "People of the State of California v. Moore" Results 141 - 160 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am by Marie Louise
Newsru LTD (The IP Factor)   Netherlands Major Usenet provider ordered to remove all infringing content (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom Expedited trials in English patent actions – HTC v Apple (judgment of Arnold J on 19th September 2011) (Kluwer Patent Blog) Newzbin2 team up with The Pirate Bay to defeat site blocking (TorrentFreak) EWHC (Pat): Halliburton gets simulation patent after all: Halliburton Energy Services v Comptroller-General of Patents (IPKat) (EPLAW)… [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:35 pm by Josh Blackman
Perhaps the only outlier, in recent memory, of a rapid unanimous decision was Dames & Moore v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
I ran into this dilemma the other day when discussing the classic case of Moore v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
 The Court also granted cert. in five-time relisted capital case Moore v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Moore, No. 07-3770 Sentence for convictions on federal drug charges is affirmed over defendant's equal-protection argument that he was a "class of one" subjected to a federal mandatory-minimum sentence, whereas similarly-situated defendants charged in state court faced no such minimum. .. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am by Eugene Volokh
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Next week in the courts On 28 January 2013, the Court of Appeal (Moore-Bick, Aikens and Black LJJ) will give judgment in the libel costs case of Henry v NGN. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Moore, No. 07-3434 Denial of an application for habeas corpus from a conviction and sentence for gross sexual imposition and rape is affirmed where petitioner's Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy was not violated because the requisite high degree of necessity existed for a mistrial. [read post]