Search for: "People v Edison" Results 141 - 158 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2008, 8:31 am
s Power to Prosecute Chair for Nonprofits Law Breaches People, plaintiff-respondent v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
: (Spicy IP),‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly II’ – Business, public interest forces and the role of IP: (IP finance),Interview with Debra Harry, Indigenous People’s Council on Biocolonialism: (Intellectual Property Watch),WIPO Committee on Development and IP wraps up inaugural meeting: (WIPO),Five IP policy questions for WIPO DG Candidates: (Intellectual Property Watch),IP strategy for R&D: keep records like Thomas Edison:… [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
The proposal to use electricity provoked legal wrangles between the Edison and Westinghouse companies which promoted, respectively, direct and alternating current.Following the first electrocution in 1890, Dr Alfred Southwick, the chair of the commission which recommended the electric chair, was reported as saying that "we live in a higher civilisation from this day"(5) though Thomas Edison reportedly "rebuked the doctors and said it was a mistake to have let them… [read post]
3 May 2007, 3:34 pm
In the past people had used candles and gas lamps. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:00 am
Next the monarch gave control of information to a trusted group of people to patrol its ranks and take the benefit of its labor. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 2:47 am
The IPKat is delighted to see that his old friend Frederick Mostert, author of the INTA's famously heavy tome on Famous and Well-Known Trade Marks, has burst into print again with a captivatingly light read, From Edison to iPod - which has just been published by Dorling Kindersley pretty much today.What the IPKat says:Subtitled 'Protect your ideas and make money', this book reflects the author's belief that creativity well tempered with good advice and common sense is a… [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 1:21 pm
***In passing, note there was a famous IP case involving portable toilets: Carson v. [read post]