Search for: "People v Jacobs" Results 141 - 160 of 695
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2009, 2:25 am
DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBankruptcy Annuity Payments Exempted From Estate Under Debtor and Creditor, Insurance Law Provisions Jacob v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:48 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Droney, Jacobs and Leval) says "Comments allegedly made by Alles and Matranga to LeGrand’s co‐workers satisfy each of these elements, even if they were not made in LeGrand’s presence: reasonable people would find an environment to be hostile if supervisors make racist comments about them behind their backs. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
There is no such evidence in this case.The case is Myers v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:48 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Town of Oyster Bay enacted this law to restrict immigrants from seeking work as day laborers.The case is Centro De La Comunidad v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 6:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says there is no case.The case is Basinski v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:26 am
Supreme Court has indeed ruled on laws of this nature, drawing the conclusion that you cite above in the 1982 Enmund v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
Here Brandsmiths' Andrew Lee pens a guest post on the dissemination of misinformation, or at least over-generalised information, to a wide audience of people who may not realise its true import. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
The Act is there to protect people against unjustified harassment. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
The law isn’t limited to people who are in prison or on probation (whose First Amendment rights are sharply reduced because of that); it applies even to people who had finished serving their sentences. [read post]
5 May 2010, 1:14 pm
In a very narrow ruling, the Court in the case Debra H. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 1:14 pm by Daniel Clement
In a very narrow ruling, the Court in the case Debra H. v. [read post]