Search for: "People v Jones"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2017, 7:50 am
California and in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 11:44 am
(You similarly can see why the Court of Appeal property rejects the analogy to the Jones GPS case. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:03 am
Jones. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:26 am
Chris McGrath v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
., the opinion's reference to "Officer Jones’s belief that any cannabis being transported in a vehicle must be in a heat-sealed container. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Jones. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
Take United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:18 am
” Adams v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:25 pm
Jones. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:26 pm
After all, the money flows the way it does regardless.That said, try as I might -- and I've tried hard -- I can't exactly tell what Justice Jones is trying to say in this opinion.If her point is that the trial court awarded $1.4 million in fees and costs to California and that wasn't an abuse of discretion given these facts, yep, right on. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:06 am
The case, U.S. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:37 pm
Jones, No. 06-2472. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
The Fourth Amendment protects the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:36 pm
[E]nslaved people were often their primary source of wealth. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
Jones, people are going to thing you're making the case up. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
" As a result, it violates the reasonable expectation of privacy people have in their physical movements from the Jones concurrences. 5) How Is Accessing Historical Cell-Site Records "Absolute Surveillance"? [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm
As a result, I think that although the government lost Jones 9-0, it did far better than everyone has recognized so far. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 1:43 pm
The People of the State of California agree, and support the trial court's view of the statute on appeal.But the Court of Appeal disagrees. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 11:29 am
Jones knows this, but instead she chooses to insult people. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:07 am
Jones, 2009 Ohio 316, 2009 Ohio LEXIS 222 (February 4, 2009). [read post]
