Search for: "People v Samuel B. Person" Results 141 - 160 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Samuel Levine brings up the fact that I have in fact over the years been associated with, shall we say, a certain kind of “indeterminacy” with regard to legal statements as well as publicly drawing on my being Jewish and my interest in certain kinds of hermeneutic questions linked especially with Talmudic inquiry. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 2:03 pm by Lawrence Solum
For example, some have argued that religious reason should be excluded from public debate; others argue for the exclusion of statements which degrade people on the basis of their religion, race or ethnicity. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 12:34 pm by Lawrence Solum
For example, some have argued that religious reason should be excluded from public debate; others argue for the exclusion of statements which degrade people on the basis of their religion, race or ethnicity. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
(See the account in Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion for the Supreme Court on page 8 in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Rehnquist in 2005 and Justice Samuel A. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Or what about Justices who compiled works such as those collected by Samuel Blatchford in Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Second Circuit (1852-88) (24 vols.)? [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  Quite obviously, there are extraordinary difficulties in defining what one means by “the public interest,” especially in a pluralized (and polarized) world, but the response surely cannot be a blind faith (“veneration”) in the existing structures and those persons holding office in them. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm by renholding
I know that much time went into this release, including many hours over at least one very taxing weekend put in by Melissa Roverts Harke, Robert Holowka, Sirimal Mukerjee, Adele Kittredge Murray, Neema Nassiri-Motlagh, Jill Pritzker, David Stevens, Thomas Strumpf, Sarah ten Siethoff, and Samuel K. [read post]