Search for: "People v Shelby" Results 141 - 160 of 316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2017, 7:31 am by JB
" Presumably, these "very fine people" included those who carried Nazi swastikas, racist signs and torches, and shouted slogans like "Jews will not replace us. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:44 am by Steven Schwinn
But given the way this court has ruled in recent federalism cases (like Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 7:38 am by NCC Staff
However, the 2013 Supreme Court decision of Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 1:45 pm
Progress, however, has been interrupted.In 2013, the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 5:41 pm by Maseeh Moradi
Though Kennedy is no political liberal—his votes in Bush v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
You should be out frolicking in the spring weather, or enjoying the monuments or doing something normal people do. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
You will recall that a few years back in Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 12:53 pm by Stephen Griffin
Vann Woodward, this left little for public education, public health, and aid-dependent people such as the insane and the blind. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:51 am by Alexandra Gutierrez
The Court was not persuaded by Verrilli’s argument in defense of the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:15 am
  These voter restrictions are the result of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 6:17 am by Stephen Wermiel
Windsor, voiding a key portion of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, was decided on June 26, the final day in 2013; Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 7:26 am by Andrew Koppelman
  So far from offering any remedy for these abuses, the Roberts Court licensed them, in its extraordinary gutting of the Voting Rights Act by a 5-4 margin in Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Like other factual findings in the trial court, the Supreme Court defers to these findings as to predominant motive.Finally, the fact that relevant portions of the Voting Rights Act on which the Arizona districting commission relied have since been held unconstitutional in Shelby County v. [read post]