Search for: "People v. Bear"
Results 141 - 160
of 5,814
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 3:36 pm
(Ilya Somin) When the Supreme Court for the first time recognized the existence of an individual right to bear arms in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 1:21 pm
The blogosphere is abuzz with discussion of Paker v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:48 am
Clause 27(a) …Further, neither the vessel, her master or Owners, nor Charterers shall, unless otherwise in this charter expressly provided, be liable for any loss or damage or delay or failure in performance hereunder arising or resulting from… arrest or restraint of princes, rulers or people. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:47 am
Great British Teddy Bear Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:30 am
Alderman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:54 pm
"A well regulated Militia[,] being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 4:15 pm
On the assumption that useful information should come from people who have some expertise, one needs to be certified as an expert in order to contribute to Wex. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 11:53 am
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s the opinion in People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:51 pm
And I have serious concerns that, at least in some cases (though by no means in most of them), that decision might even result in people innocent of an offense being convicted. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:10 pm
At least in this context.It bears mention that Wear is a huge heroin- and pill-head. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 3:12 pm
And -- to make matters worse -- the first paragraph ends with the following: "It bears emphasis we are only addressing a felony sentence imposed in Los Angeles County. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 4:12 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:46 am
Peake, et al. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 11:24 am
Ancestry Section 230 Doesn’t Protect Advertising “Background Reports” on People–Lukis v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 8:02 am
Justice Scalia's opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am
“How would each of you have decided Loving v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:39 pm
So farmers are the ones who are going to bear the brunt of any water reduction regardless of how it's doled out. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 2:10 pm
Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008); McDonald v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:33 pm
I mean, they claim there are a lot of people who insist on their right to bear arms, but I'm pretty certain none of those people live in New York, so do I really care? [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
People v Sivells and People v Arotin held that a sex offender making an application for a downward departure bears the burden of establishing his or her entitlement to relief. [read post]
