Search for: "People v. Cato" Results 141 - 160 of 478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2019, 9:51 am by Eric Goldman
Facebook has 30,000 people (a mix of employees and contractors, if that matters) working on Safety & Security. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  As I have argued elsewhere, it is one thing to repeat the injunction “let justice be done though the heavens fall,” even if one doubts that many people are really willing to adhere to the precept. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Not good [Sam Bieler via Scott Greenfield, Jacob Sullum] Judge rules that New Jersey may not automatically suspend driving privileges over unpaid child support without a hearing to establish willfulness, lest it violate due process and fundamental fairness [New Jersey Law Journal; Kavadas v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:53 pm by Simon Lester
Some of my Cato colleagues have filed an amicus brief in support of the cert petition. [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:53 pm by Simon Lester
Some of my Cato colleagues have filed an amicus brief in support of the cert petition. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Circuit case of Guedes v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 9:01 am by Walter Olson
” [Ilya Shapiro and Patrick Moran on Cato cert amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to review Mitchell v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 12:05 pm by Ilya Somin
To briefly recap, the main point at issue in Knick is whether the Court should overrule or limit Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 6:33 am by John Jascob
Cato claims injury because a specific gag order prevents it from publishing an entrepreneur’s account that he was the victim of an overzealous SEC investigation (Cato Institute v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Long a fixture of administrative law, Chevron v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 3:48 am by SHG
The bulk of the court’s decision turned on whether UMW “exercise[d] substantial control over both the harasser and the context in which the known harassment occurs,” as required to establish Title IX liability under the Supreme Court’s 1999 decision in Davis v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:15 am by David Post
In 2016, however, his conviction (for having failed to update his registration) was vacated, after the Supreme Court, in US v. [read post]