Search for: "People v. Conte"
Results 141 - 160
of 259
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2014, 2:31 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:29 pm
The destruction of the unquickened fetus was not manslaughter at common law as held in Evans v People. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:45 pm
In People v Crandall, the Court observed that the Commission's recommendations cited in Amaro "only relate to those instances where the commission of a new offense is employed as the predicate for revocation without the issuance of a formal charge by the probation department, the issuance of an arrest warrant, an appropriate notice to appear to the defendant, the assignment of counsel if the defendant cannot afford his own and the holding of a full and complete adversary… [read post]
13 May 2014, 3:04 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:36 pm
In the People v Foster 27 NY2d 47 52 [1970] the defendant challenged the admission of the speedometer deviation record into evidence to prove the reliability of the speedometer. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:54 pm
To Be Cont.... [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 3:12 pm
The Judge cited Zhang v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 3:09 pm
Teague (1989) and People v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 2:59 pm
To Be Cont.... [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 2:23 pm
To Be cont... [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 3:24 pm
To Be Cont.... [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
Instead, we get this gift from LEXIS/NEXIS: Whitener v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:45 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:23 pm
The Court of Appeals most recently analyzed the specific scope and application of "particular effect" jurisdiction in Matter of Taub v Altman (2004). [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:41 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 3:59 pm
Further, to admit the results of the Intoxilyzer 5000EN, which is conducted at the precinct, the People must show that the devise was properly calibrated, generally within about a six month period as held in People v Boscic. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
The case is Lashley v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:34 pm
In Abinanti v Pascale, Hoeffner v John F. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:57 am
See Conte, supra note 14. [93]. [read post]
