Search for: "People v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC." Results 141 - 160 of 941
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
” Kohn and Sanjour battled the EPA for four years, and on May 30, 1995, in a case that impacted every government employee, the United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, in William Sanjour et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:32 am by Stephen Sachs
If most people don't check PACER, would a final judgment from a district court be of any help? [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:11 pm by Michael Froomkin
Florida’s system uses appointment plus retention elections for Supreme Court Justices and District Court of Appeal Judges. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:54 pm by Richard Hunt
“Content” is a term that comes from WCAG and refers to “the information in a web page or web application, including: natural information such as text, images, and sounds and code or markup that defines structure, presentation, etc. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm by Jane Turner
In July of 2011, he filed a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act, Blake Percival v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm by Jane Turner
In July of 2011, he filed a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act, Blake Percival v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Choose Your Own Adventure: court seems to presume CYOA famous. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, in a ruling last week, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the district court’s ruling here saying that there was no such requirement. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:14 am by James Williams
Some people think the duration for every copyright registration is from the moment of the work’s creation and for 70 years after the death of the author or artist. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 6:06 am by Florian Mueller
Far east of the Eastern District, a certain panel of judges of the Munich I Regional Court held a Nokia [almost a troll] v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bold applicants may even argue that the Court majority at least implicitly endorsed the district court’s reasoning that domain names are usually inherently distinctive b/c everyone understands that they are exclusive—but trademark function is a requirement even for matter that could in theory be inherently distinctive, so we might see more attention to that point. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm by Giles Peaker
Escott, R (On the application of) v Chichester District Council (2020) EWHC 1687 (Admin) A judicial review where the relevant parts played out in the early stages of the pandemic lockdown, and where the central question was whether self contained accommodation provided without a fridge, cooker and bed, was suitable within the meaning of section 206 Housing Act 1996, such that interim relief could be ordered. [read post]