Search for: "People v. Downing (1985)" Results 141 - 160 of 507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2019, 12:05 pm by Ilya Somin
Hamilton Bank, a 1985 decision that makes it virtually impossible to bring many types of takings cases in federal court. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Jed Rubenfeld
But in 1985, as I pointed out in my earlier piece, the Supreme Court in Skinner v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here is my post from when the panel opinion was handed down: [* * *] From today's Fifth Circuit decision in Book People, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
Minor became `physically fidgety’ and `immediately reached down into his pocket. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 7:00 am by Jacques Berlinerblau
They were buoyed by Justice William Rehnquist’s 1985 dissent in Wallace v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am by Giles Peaker
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:57 am by Jeff Gamso
United States, 470 U.S. 598, 607–08 (1985) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Albertini, 472 U.S. 675, 689 (1985) (describing the requirements of narrow tailoring under intermediate scrutiny); Board of Trustees of State Univ. of N.Y. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Albertini, 472 U.S. 675, 689 (1985) (describing the requirements of narrow tailoring under intermediate scrutiny); Board of Trustees of State Univ. of N.Y. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
The high court took up the case to reconsider its 1985 decision in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 67 (1964) (taking the same view as Herbert); In re Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983, 988 & n.4 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc) (likewise); Phelps v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
  He said he struggles to hold down a job and can't work in hot conditions.You can, if you are interested, see some of the photos mentioned in the article above here. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
These were resisted by the then government on the basis that they would be watering down the effects of DTs and "would effectively require a double possession hearing". [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
These were resisted by the then government on the basis that they would be watering down the effects of DTs and "would effectively require a double possession hearing". [read post]