Search for: "People v. Gay"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2017, 11:36 am
That's a little bit different.There's also some great doctrinal stuff in the opinion about what you do with mixed-motive Batson challenges, particularly as applied to prospective gay jurors in a case like this one. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:23 am
In a 1996 case, Nabozny v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:37 pm
X appeals to the NY Court of Appeals, which ruled 4-3 today (People v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:35 am
That guy.Now that Christian conservative groups have given up trying to convince young people that gay marriage is wrong, they can redouble their efforts on the cinematic front. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:14 am
Even though marriage equality is the law of the land, gay and lesbian people still encounter many hurdles. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:48 am
Many people last week opened their Facebooks to find a pink equality sign on a red background populating their Facebook newsfeed. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 2:57 pm
Zhan v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 6:25 pm
Federal courts have also struck down state laws that would have allowed schools to fire teachers for advocating pro-gay policies in public (National Gay Task Force v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:15 pm
Five major advocacy groups working to promote gay rights, reacting to the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
This text may seem a little puzzling to people who don't walk the streets of London, but there was some rhyme and reason: it was in response to a very striking advertisement by gay rights campaign organisation Stonewall, which read: "SOME PEOPLE ARE GAY, GET OVER IT!" [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
OPM and the unconstitutional conditions argument in Mass v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:14 pm
303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, based in Chicago, ruled on April 23 in Nuxoll v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:12 pm
They do also say that theoretically such claims by gay employees should be allowed, but then they throw up their hands and say something like "it's wayyy too hard to sort out all these different types of gay people, so fuhgeddaboutit. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 9:13 am
Riscili v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm
Though the anti-sodomy laws were declared unconstitutional in the 2003 Supreme Court decision, Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:49 pm
The real issue in the case, the question of how gay people and religious conservatives can live out their ideals, was obscured by weak free speech claims. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 7:28 am
A potentially groundbreaking legal battle over Connecticut's exclusion of gay people from the state's marriage law has catapulted the debate over same-sex marriage to a new level. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
The post DYKES ON BIKES No Longer Idling After Matal v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:42 pm
Both DOMA and Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell have been on the books since the Clinton Administration, whereas prior to the ruling in Perry v. [read post]
