Search for: "People v. Gay"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2006, 7:41 am
Where does MSM get these people? [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 9:44 pm
Startzell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
A fifth, Scardina v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 1:42 am
The California Supreme Court's decision in Strauss v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm
” When certain people see a married gay couple their thoughts drift to sodomy. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
The case in which the DOJ filed its brief is called Zarda v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 9:07 am
The Supreme Court has denied the petition for certiorari in the much watched case of Elane Photography v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 2:32 pm
In Belykh v Holder, Yevgenih Belykh alleged that he had been persecuted in Russia due to his being gay. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
That's a lot of m*****f***ing.First there was People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:48 am
In that moment, it was hard to be confident that the Justices would strike down Colorado’s ban on antidiscrimination protections for gay people, given Bowers v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:54 am
In M.A.T. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:30 am
HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 31 (07 July 2010) - Read Judgment The Supreme Court has ruled that the government’s “Anne Frank” policy of sending back gay refugees to their home countries where they feared persecution is unlawful as it breached their human rights.. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
He says, for example, drawing on the gender-based peremptory case, J.E.B. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:36 am
That's a little bit different.There's also some great doctrinal stuff in the opinion about what you do with mixed-motive Batson challenges, particularly as applied to prospective gay jurors in a case like this one. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 5:59 am
CV-09-701308).Gay People's Chronicle reports on the plaintiff, Langdon, the origins of the case, and a 2007 precedent that appears to undermine it - State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:16 pm
(para 55) It was held to be relevant that the leaflets were left in the lockers of young people who were at an impressionable and sensitive age and who had no possibility to decline to accept them. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:23 am
In a 1996 case, Nabozny v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:37 pm
X appeals to the NY Court of Appeals, which ruled 4-3 today (People v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:14 am
Even though marriage equality is the law of the land, gay and lesbian people still encounter many hurdles. [read post]