Search for: "People v. Hale"
Results 141 - 160
of 330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm
Today’s lone case for argument, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 7:06 pm
" United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Lady Hale, the only female Justice, has certainly been vocal of late. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 6:33 am
In the case of Ore v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 7:51 am
Let's go back to 1895 and the Supreme Court decision in Coffin v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:20 am
He commented on the court’s commitment to quality, and the fact that a number of cases heard by the UKSC over the past year have been of considerable public interest (referring in particular to R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another, Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Bill 2012 – Reference by the Attorney General and Bank Mellat v HM Treasury). [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm
This was confirmed in the case of Douglas & ors v Hello! [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
As a result, 16 people were arrested for driving under the influence. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
In a media release, the penal reform charity notes that in its experience of working in prisons, carrying out research and representing young people in custody, “segregating vulnerable and disturbed people tends to make their problems worse”. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm
Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765, 784 (1978) (corporation has First Amendment right of free speech); Hale v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
Option 1 was rejected as too narrow, leaving the possibility that serious errors of law affecting large numbers of people would go uncorrected. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm
That case was Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:34 am
Yusupov v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 12:04 am
His tally is now at an astonishing 105, which is second amongst all living people. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 8:30 am
Texas and Obergefell v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:06 pm
R (Elkundi) v Birmingham and R (Imam) v Croydon (2022) EWCA Civ 601 (not on Bailii yet. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am
He applied his Guidance on the Identification of the Ordinary Residence of People in Need of Community Care Services, England, which purported to apply the House of Lords judgment in R v Barnet LBC, ex parte Shah [1983] 2 AC 309 and Turner J’s judgment in R v Waltham Forest, ex parte Vale The Times, 25 February 1985. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:35 am
It’s amazing what people leave out in plain view for police officers to see, because that’s also the situation in State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am
" Hale v. [read post]
