Search for: "People v. Heard (1993)"
Results 141 - 160
of 288
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
In People v Trabazo [193 Misc.2d 436] (180 Misc 2d 961 [Crim Ct, Queens County 1999]), it was held that these limitations on superior courts were sound procedural mechanisms. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:07 am
Holiday Carpet Service, Inc., 615 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)(existence of contract may impose nondelegable duty to third persons); Mills v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
You probably have heard of Gilligan, since he later went on to helm a program now carved on the medium's Mt. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:21 am
Collins (1993); Johnson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 5:18 pm
British Columbia (Attorney General), [1993] 3 S.C.R. 519. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm
Something of greater urgency had bumped the survivors of a massacre within the last few weeks of as many as 2,000 people from the first half of the show. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
To be sure, justices are people, and people have biases, usually in favor of their own groups. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Romer, 854 P.2d 1270 (Colo.1993)(Evans I). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:02 am
People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
Although Section 2 requires jurisdictions with large minority populations to take race into account in drawing district lines, in a series of cases beginning with the 1993 case of Shaw v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 4:33 am
People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
Yeager v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
Regents of Univ. of Cal. (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1112, 1132.) [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 2:24 pm
George Mason University (4th Cir. 1993)). [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
I’ve recently heard some people argue that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 — which the Supreme Court applied in Hobby Lobby — violates the separation of powers. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
Citing Shaw v Reno (509 U.S. 630, 1993), he asserted that, in cautioning against impermissible racial stereotypes, the Supreme Court has rejected the assumption that all individuals of the same race think alike, but that proposition would be a necessary beginning point were the Seattle formulation to control. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 6:14 pm
By Ana Choi On Tuesday, March 25, the Supreme Court heard the oral arguments for the combined cases of Sebelius v. [read post]
