Search for: "People v. Love (1988)" Results 141 - 160 of 175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2010, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
   The 8th shows her no love, though; in Gaskins v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(I think KP Permanent shows that this won’t work, because though the Court likes to limit TM, it also loves multifactor test and allowing lower courts to add in new factors that make a difference.) [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:50 am by Durga Rao
The Judgment extracted below would be very useful to understand the things practically and it is very useful for the people who have invested huge amounts in the Company thinking that they will get their rightful share and rights in the Company. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Relation of this Final Rule to the July 2, 2009, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking V. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 12:08 am
None of those killed by his cowardly act had a chance to go home and say goodbye to their loved ones. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:52 pm by Daniel Brown
”‘A mysterious kid'Mackel Peterkin was born on a rainy night in Scarborough in the fall of 1988. [read post]