Search for: "People v. Marvin"
Results 141 - 160
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2010, 1:37 pm
Richard Marvin, III, et al. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:59 am
Marvin v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
After initially denying the motion, Judge Marvin Garbis of the U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:29 am
In People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:20 pm
EDNY Judge Weinstein’s much publicized sentencing decision in the securities fraud case, United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Rick Georges considers whether Wolfram Alpha is a reliable, albeit less intelligent, substitute for Marvin or that other paranoid entity, Google. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Rick Georges considers whether Wolfram Alpha is a reliable, albeit less intelligent, substitute for Marvin or that other paranoid entity, Google. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:50 am
That a then Yale professor and later Federal judge (Ralph Winter) was the brains behind the original challenge to campaign finance laws, in Buckley v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:57 pm
By Eric Goldman Jones v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:18 pm
(And we're talking policy here, not what today's Supreme Court would decide.)Second, Steve cites People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:08 am
In Ohio v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
See Graham v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:48 am
People of good will can and do disagree. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:48 am
People of good will can and do disagree. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 8:25 pm
In People v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
Rev. 2561 *** Marvin E. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:09 pm
Supreme Court ruling in the case of Employment Division v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:38 am
Gun advocates, it would seem, are emboldened in the wake of D.C. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 10:49 pm
The headline of this post is a bit misleading in that, the court will determine only one facet of Jessica's law as implemented in California, it is with respect to civil commitment.7-10-2008 California:The California Supreme Court agreed yesterday to decide whether a popular law that allows sexually violent predators to be confined indefinitely is constitutional.At their weekly conference in San Francisco, the justices voted 5-2, with Justices Ming Chin and Marvin Baxter in the… [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 9:48 pm
View the article here07/10/2008The California Supreme Court agreed yesterday to decide whether a popular law that allows sexually violent predators to be confined indefinitely is constitutional.At their weekly conference in San Francisco, the justices voted 5-2, with Justices Ming Chin and Marvin Baxter in the minority, to grant the defendant's petition for review in People v. [read post]
