Search for: "People v. Neuberger"
Results 141 - 160
of 163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
” [76-77] In McKennitt v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
Not least because I get to use the word 'Snook' without people pointing at me and laughing. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
Not least because I get to use the word 'Snook' without people pointing at me and laughing. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 6:28 am
But some judgments are genuinely important for many people; for example the recent ruling in Tchenguiz & Ors v Imerman – relating to the use of stolen evidence in court - which could impact anyone involved in divorce proceedings. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:24 am
It also is important to the public at large, who have a right to know that the courts will, to some extent at least, protect their rights to privacy and not encourage people to steal otherwise private documents. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:15 am
Lord Neuberger, the Master of the Rolls, said that “there can be no doubt that the defendants should have the right to express the views which they wish to express; similarly, there is no doubt that they should enjoy the right to assemble together. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
The context of s.82(2) in the Act tends to favour Lord Neuberger's interpretation, in view, for instance of the continued right to buy under s.121 which only a secure tenant can have, s.118. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
The context of s.82(2) in the Act tends to favour Lord Neuberger's interpretation, in view, for instance of the continued right to buy under s.121 which only a secure tenant can have, s.118. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:22 am
The then Lord Justice Neuberger was one the Court of Appeal judges in the seminal 2005 privacy decision in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:59 am
(b) Father Clonan’s functions as a priest included a duty to evangelise, or “to bring the gospel to be known to other people”. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:44 am
Since, as Neuberger (judge, as he was) said (I believe in the erythropoietin case, Kirin Amgen) that "life is too short to consider the file history", his argument may fly. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
The normal order of things is of course for young people to claim to be older than they really are. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
The normal order of things is of course for young people to claim to be older than they really are. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:42 am
The team lined up for this purpose is Lord Neuberger MR, Lady Justice Arden and Lord Justice Sullivan. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:39 am
Lord Neuberger gave a concurring judgment which touched on a number of interesting points which don’t appear to have been fully argued. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
The sole opinion is from Baroness Hale, although in effect a joint opinion with Lord Neuberger. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
Lord Neuberger gives five reasons: (1) the opening words of s 167(2) do not suggest that such an assessment is required. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
The House of Lords Opinions in Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 were handed down today. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
Lord Neuberger gave the leading judgment. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:13 am
I have been following with interest the software patent case of Symbian v Comptroller General for Patents. [read post]
