Search for: "People v. Nor Woods"
Results 141 - 160
of 226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
” As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
(Notably, neither Hobby Lobby nor Conestoga Wood has alleged that any of the foregoing would not be true as applied to them.)To be sure, not all employers will in fact drop their plans—nor is that something that Congress assumed or desired when it enacted the ACA. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
” Many people receive such services through Medicare, or Medicaid, or by purchasing a plan (often with substantial government subsidies) on a government-run “exchange. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Indeed, Eugene V. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 7:17 am
A search engine is good to answer a question like, “How many people live in China? [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
Most people accomplish this by writing about him and his actions and his words. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am
E.g., Wood v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:41 am
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:28 am
Furthermore, in Batson v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:28 am
Furthermore, in Batson v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:29 am
Arenas v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
To take the absurd and bring it down to simple terms, if Birch wood was illegal to possess and you had a piece of wood you thought was oak – can the government imprison you simply based on the fact you possessed wood? [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:15 am
Organ Recovery Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:15 am
Organ Recovery Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 8:32 pm
By Cara CooksonState v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
Other resolved complaints listed: Mr Giovanni Di Stefano v Sunday Mail (Clauses 1, 2), 04/05/2012; Mr Michael Speck v The Sunday Times (Clauses 1, 2), 04/05/2012; Peter Reynolds v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 03/05/2012); Jean-Pierre Bestel v Gravesend Reporter (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; A man v Sunday Mail (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Mr Adam Wood v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Croydon Council v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1),… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
Schutz Container Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
In West v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:12 pm
, mining, construction, textile, wood production, metal production and recreational facilities) and low-consumption (e.g., electric power generation) users.4 This could increase annual revenue to almost $6 million, with minimal incremental costs to government, and would recover about 40 per cent of the government’s direct costs on water quantity management programs. [read post]
