Search for: "People v. Payne"
Results 141 - 157
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2008, 10:19 am
Payne, 145 A.D.2d 617, 618 (N.Y. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:57 am
This changed with the Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Payne, No. 07-5592 In a conviction for multiple counts involving drugs, firearms, violence and multiple murders, court order authorizing involuntary medication treatment plan designed to restore defendant's competency to stand trial is affirmed over claims of error that the district court erred in finding that the evidence offered at the hearing was sufficient to establish that the proposed treatment is substantially likely to restore defendant's competency. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 5:11 am
Nearly two decades ago, in Payne v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm
[xiv] Most people just call it “section 1983. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 1:46 am
Payne'People v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:18 pm
In Payne, the Court reversed the decision of the Michigan Supreme Court, which had applied North Carolina v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 2:13 am
Payne in Texas, and Maverick v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
[NJ-6] - 10/16/2007 Rep Payne, Donald M. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
[NJ-6] - 10/16/2007 Rep Payne, Donald M. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 12:00 pm
Todisco v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 3:55 pm
[A sweep is for people, not evidence.] [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
Payne v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 3:14 am
People v Feingold, 7 NY3d 288 [2006]; People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266 [2004]; People v Gonzalez, 1 NY3d 464 [2004], People v Hafeez, 100 NY2d 253 [2003]; see also Policano v Herbert, 430 F3d 82 [2d Cir 2005], questions certified to the N.Y. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 1:33 am
.
People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Defendants have included people who have never even used a computer, and many people who although they have used a computer, have never engaged in any peer to peer file sharing.Sometimes the cases are misleadingly referred to as cases against 'downloaders'; in fact the RIAA knows nothing of any downloading when it commences suit, and in many instances no downloading ever took place.It is more accurate to refer to the cases as cases against persons who paid for internet… [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
Payne-Barahona v. [read post]
