Search for: "People v. Phillips" Results 141 - 160 of 825
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Jack Gilbert, Lead Litigation Counsel for Facebook, explained that Facebook generally takes a neutral position on applications to identify people behind pages or profiles on their network. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:29 am
People v Phillips, 7 Misc 3d 1004 (County Ct, Lawrence County 2005): The defendant did not possess a "billy" when he was found to have a "collapsible baton." [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:13 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
And when lists go on—as a Maine dairy company recently learned the hard way in O’Connor v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm by JB
Josh Blackman, James Phillips, and John Yoo argue that a federal mandate to wear masks to prevent the spread of coronavirus would be unconstitutional under NFIB v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Most people fixate on the first element of legal malpractice – departure from good practice. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Lessons from the Not-So-Distant Past The closest analogy in the Supreme Court's cases is the unanimous decision in Hurley v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:59 am by Carolyn Moskowitz
As Jason Cowart reports in the current issue of The Pomerantz Monitor, one of the most controversial Supreme Court decisions of 2010, Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:30 am by jonathanturley
” In a now-deleted tweet, Phillips later called people “idiots” for “treating this as some harmless act. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:08 am by Kaylan Phillips
The foundation filed cert-stage and merits-stage amicus briefs in support of the government in Department of Commerce v. [read post]