Search for: "People v. Quinn"
Results 141 - 160
of 297
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2014, 7:18 am
Nonetheless, the Abood ruling survives another day, allowing public-sector unions to breathe a sigh of relief, having averted what could have been a knock-out punch (Harris v Quinn, June 30, 2014, Alito, S). [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:48 am
In Burwell v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:37 pm
[v] Bush v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:25 am
Quinn didn’t go nearly as far as many people hoped/feared. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:46 pm
What most people will take away from Harris v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:55 pm
Quinn — whether this extends to personal assistants hired for ill people, and who in some ways are employed by the particular individuals, and in other ways by the state. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm
Quinn, both authored by Justice Alito. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
Quinn. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
Alito Jr. would have the Court’s opinion in Harris v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:42 am
In Harris v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:22 am
Quinn at 10am. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Matt Bodie considers how the decision in Harris might play out if, as many people believe, Justice Samuel A. [read post]
23 May 2014, 7:42 pm
In the recent May, 2014 case of Quinn v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:21 pm
They've got to realize they're not going to slow Android down by suing people. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:59 pm
I wasn't nearly as "pro-Apple" or "anti-Android" as some people made me out to be, but when I said something positive for Apple, it reaffirmed many people's beliefs, and when I said something positive for Android, it didn't fit into the picture. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:17 am
The case of Harris v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 1:12 am
“Unions will survive but the people with disabilities and other medical disorders, they might never recover. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 8:15 pm
Columnist George Will cites the Cato Institute amicus brief in Harris v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
The key thing is: people get push now, they will get it in the future, and should the BGH unexpectedly revive the patent in its original form, then the patent will almost certainly have expired in the meantime.I believe that wrongful-enforcement damages are the only context in which Motorola could practically benefit from what its lead counsel in this nullity action as well as the related infringement proceedings, Quinn Emanuel's Dr. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Just watch out when one of us starts blogging about dead people. [read post]
