Search for: "People v. Race"
Results 141 - 160
of 4,995
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2010, 9:21 pm
In Taylor v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:23 am
From Tyree B. v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:07 pm
In Bond v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
The reason for a compelling state interest was “not merely that race was important but that the burden on the people who are rejected because of race is an interest that the state could seek to protect. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:42 am
In May 1954, Brown v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm
Wygant v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 8:09 pm
That is the question currently being argued in People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:10 am
The Chicago Heights decree enjoins YRC from engaging in any further discrimination because of race and from retaliating against people who complain about racial bias, and requires that the company retain consultants to examine its discipline and work assignment procedures and recommend changes to prevent racial disparities. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 9:07 am
Patel v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 9:41 pm
A lot of people misunderstand the issues in Ricci v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 10:11 pm
One more item about the Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
Buchanan v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 11:57 am
Supreme Court held in Powell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
In Washington v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Young v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:30 pm
Ruling in the case of Batson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:39 am
The Illinois Court of Appeals overturned a conviction Friday in People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:15 pm
* Handicapping the race for the Supreme Court vacancy. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:00 am
., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
