Search for: "People v. Rosenberg" Results 141 - 160 of 188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2015, 4:11 am by SHG
Rosenberg, Esq., General Counsel, New York County District Attorney’ s Office; Rowan D. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
Or are they representing and serving a class of people not reflecting the diversity of the public? [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 10:43 am by Megan Carpenter
As the court stated in 1995, in Rosenberger v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 9:28 pm
  They dislike all poor people equally. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:05 am by Ritika Singh
Orin Kerr writes in the Volokh Conspiracy about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:25 am by Danielle & Andy
 and attorneys with the Michigan law firm, Barron, Rosenberg, Mayoras & Mayoras, P.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:21 am by Tara Hofbauer
Wells shared the government’s recently filed response to an “end of war” motion in al-Warafi v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
  The caveat makes sense, but it clearly was never intended to be some sort of bright-line rule for people too lazy to look at the actual studies and data. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 10:42 am by Cody Poplin
Carol Rosenberg of the Miami Herald publicizes the recent reveal in Obama v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:56 am by Lyle Denniston
Dale, 2000), and, second, the line of cases that included protection for recognition of religious groups at public universities, including the 1995 decision in Rosenberger v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
In Huras v Primerica Financial Services Limited[13]an agreement on settlement was reached which provided small compensation to each member of the large group of class members.[14]  The settlement provided for additional compensation to be paid to the Ontario and British Columbia RPs – $3000 and $2000 respectively.[15]  By way of contract, in Sutherland, Justice Winkler disallowed a claim where the RP sought compensation for work related to the administration of the… [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner
Lebowitz asks the court to impose the remedy that was proposed on Monday under United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:22 am by George Lenard
Miles, III, spells out exactly how the Stored Communications Act could apply to employers requesting Facebook passwords: In Pietrylo v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am by Barbara Pfeffer Billauer
By Barbara Pfeffer Billauer Approaches to resolving scientific evidentiary issues continue to diverge throughout the country.[1] A prominent recent example includes the rejection of the medical diagnosis of Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) to reflect disparate views in the scientific, medical, and legal communities. [read post]