Search for: "People v. Schneider"
Results 141 - 160
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2009, 11:40 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
Hageseth v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 11:45 pm
The case is Munroe v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:46 am
They discuss: The directive on famous marks recently promulgated by the Supreme People's Court; Pragmatic differences between Western Chinese and Coastal Chinese Courts; Background to the enormous settlement amount in the recent Chint v Schneider case; Damages awards in China; and Some recent cases on Architectural drawings and trade marks. [read post]
6 May 2009, 3:41 am
And last week, in State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
As reported extensively, in Chint v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
(Afro-IP) Australia USPTO Extends patent prosecution highway pilot with Australia and begins pilot with Germany (Patent Docs) Canada Copyright Board releases satellite radio royalty decision (Michael Geist) Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA) launching grassroots campaign for Canadian DMCA (Michael Geist) Goldstein introduces patent reform bill to ease access to medicines (Michael Geist) China US ITC victory over sucralose patents for Chinese manufacturers… [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:56 am
According to Professor Wegner, yesterday, "at the opening of the oral hearing in the Zhejiang High People's Court in Chint v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:33 am
Ortiz, 83 NY2d 323, 311 [1994] [quoting People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(IP Dragon) Columbia Sportswear successful in reducing counterfeits in China (IP Dragon) Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court orders New Apple Concept Technology to pay Apple 400,000 Yuan in damages for trade mark infringement and unfair competition (DeBund) 2386 IPR cases dealt with by Culture Administrations in Q3 (DeBund) Well-known trade marks can be recognised on basis of the products’ sales volumes (DeBund) Judicial Criteria for copyright cases (part 2) (DeBund)… [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 5:40 pm
I think the answer should be "no"--see Schneider v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 6:49 pm
That's hard to tell; compare Rumsfeld v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:50 am
"See a list of ILB entries on the Court of Appeals decision in the case of Morrison v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Most consumers agree that intellectual property law is essential to ensure that creators of inventions, ideas, designs, services and the like are rewarded for their creativity and to promote the continuation of such creations.[1] In order to grant creators with the incentive to continue creating, such creators must be equipped with the satisfaction of knowing that their creations will not be transformed into cheap imitations which will inevitably compete with their own original creations. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 2:02 am
State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
,Canadian Association of University Teachers on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Cisco on copyright in Canada: (Michael Geist),The new copyright debate: (Michael Geist),Media coverage of copyright debate: (Michael Geist), (more from Michael Geist), (and more from Michael Geist), (and more from Michael Geist),Copyright delay demonstrates power of Facebook: (Michael Geist),Access Copyright claims copyright reforms may be on hold… [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 12:22 am
Daniel Vernon
Subscription Required
NASSAU COUNTYAdministrative Law
Hearing Officer's Refusal to Permit Attorney To Cross-Examine Witnesses Violated Due Process
Matter of Schneider v. [read post]
