Search for: "People v. Shock"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
The objectively ascertainable personal injury caused by an assault bears no relation to a human evaluating and reacting to what people say and write. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
The objectively ascertainable personal injury caused by an assault bears no relation to a human evaluating and reacting to what people say and write. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 5:44 am
Shock value. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
The Information Commissioner has lauded the judgment, saying protecting the privacy rights of “people (who) may not even be aware those rights exist” was a core function of the ICO. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
PimEyes, a tool purporting to help people track their web presence, has been accused of scraping images of deceased persons to populate its database. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 7:17 pm
These people may be shocked to find drugs hidden in their car or truck or backpack, where someone has placed the product surreptitiously. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:57 pm
" This leads me to the tentative conclusion that, in a creative (but fairly shocking) use of guerilla marketing, In-N-Out Burger is now the official sponsor of the opinions in the California Appellate Reports.I might add that the first couple of sentences of the opinion were perhaps slightly confusing. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
In Pelech v Pelech, [1984] CanLII 629 (BC SC), Mrs. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Schwartz reviews the long line of cases beginning with Harlow v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm
I’m shocked, SHOCKED!! [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 9:01 am
” Reno v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
The former party leaders argued that the change would modernise government records, making it easier and more secure for people to access public services. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:13 am
Despite widespread fears in the tech community about such a blow, the justices’ arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 7:57 am
If Sony had reasonably requested more time, the judge would simply have granted Sony's motion on Friday.Sony is not just fighting Microsoft's subpoena: it's surprising, if not shocking, that Sony is also unwilling to comply with the FTC's own subpoena. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
” By this point, Texas v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 1:35 pm
In a word, swimmingly—which might surprise or even shock people who are used to associating the words "Yale Law School" with "free-speech debacle. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:07 am
Murphy, Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens) (Revisited) and Other Topics: The Seventy-Third Session of the International Law Commission International DecisionsJaemin Lee, Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
IPSO 11921-22 A man v Sunday World, 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021) Decision: Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication Statements in open court and apologies There were no statements or apologies in open court this week. [read post]
