Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 141 - 160
of 6,116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Rees, Glossip v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:53 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:53 am
The Soriano case, which refers to “Farmers Insurance Company v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:53 am
The Soriano case, which refers to “Farmers Insurance Company v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 8:26 am
In People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
United States and Schenck v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
In a 1972 case, Healy v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In this case, the Court was satisfied that the employer had “exhibited bad faith toward” MK in that Susan Dent had, within days of assuming control over the company, revoked his signing authority, “which had been a key component of his administrative functions” and then she visited with clients of the company for the sole purpose of assassinating MK’s character and advising people not to deal with him. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In this case, the Court was satisfied that the employer had “exhibited bad faith toward” MK in that Susan Dent had, within days of assuming control over the company, revoked his signing authority, “which had been a key component of his administrative functions” and then she visited with clients of the company for the sole purpose of assassinating MK’s character and advising people not to deal with him. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:51 am
The Court holds that the use of a narcotics-detection dog to sniff a defendant's body for evidence of a crime qualifies as a search, thus implicating the Fourth Amendment.The case is People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:31 am
The Court of Appeals of Washington examined this issue in State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am
In Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and Mullins v Smith [2018] UKSC 29, the Supreme Court held that the sole test in deciding whether someone is a worker is whether there is an obligation of personal performance. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Today, prosecutors in death cases still employ various tools to prevent Black people from serving on juries. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
McLaughlin v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 1:18 pm
” People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 7:25 am
” People v. [read post]