Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Good)"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,349
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2022, 4:47 pm
European Court of Human RightsNajafli v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Professor Adrian Vermeule agrees with the 1920 progressive consensus that courts should not interfere when legislatures adopt policies that reasonable people think pursue the public good. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:00 am
It is a good question.Given how important the Dobbs outcome was to the political movement that installed them in power, one might have thought that each of the five people in the majority would take special care not to, say, insult people's intelligence by citing Ruth Bader Ginsburg in supposed support of their analysis. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:42 am
* People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Rogers v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 5:03 am
Georgia v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 8:46 am
From McCarthy v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
(See People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 1:01 am
In that position, he argued several cases before the Supreme Court, including Smith v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Truth be told, many Democrats would be delighted to see the Section 3 litigation magically disappear, too—both as a matter of political strategy and of good governance. [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:07 am
From Flynn v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
For example, my amicus brief in Espinoza v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:21 am
Also important is Russia’s defiance of the provisional orders issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on March 16 in the case of Ukraine v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:02 am
People v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:02 pm
I could say, “I told you so,” but instead I’m going to lay out the reality leading to the Supreme Court draft overruling of Roe v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 8:48 am
” People ex rel. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:39 pm
Shahid Akbar Abbasi v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 6:58 pm
If Roe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Fifteen years ago I was disinclined to support proposed changes to tenure “during good behavior,” a provision that had so well secured an independent federal judiciary.[5] This past year I urged the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States to take very seriously the benefits of some reform and to try to seize the moment to build a consensus in favor of change towards a more sensible system of appointment and tenure for Supreme Court… [read post]
